)]}'
{
  "commit": "566d29033b5fd7c73e5e8bbcf7ab794194df68bd",
  "tree": "41eafe3b00d23022daa9a2668d097d6e8f37f29e",
  "parents": [
    "e39e7711d043a212de384b8f5f46ea8678416306"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Tomasz Śniatowski",
    "email": "tomasz.sniatowski@xperi.com",
    "time": "Tue Jul 14 12:26:23 2026 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Andrew Grieve",
    "email": "agrieve@google.com",
    "time": "Fri Jul 17 07:12:07 2026 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Allow testonly validations on non-testonly targets\n\nIt should be OK to have a testonly validation validate a non-testonly\ntarget. For example, a validation may itself need to depend on testonly\ntargets, and this does not affect the non-testonly target getting\nvalidated: it still has no testonly code included in it.\n\nBug: 484745924\nChange-Id: Ibe678cab77f01f72b77f0a8f1e0844f9e53b2b26\nReviewed-on: https://gn-review.googlesource.com/c/gn/+/24000\nReviewed-by: Tomasz Śniatowski \u003ctomasz.sniatowski@xperi.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: Takuto Ikuta \u003ctikuta@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: Andrew Grieve \u003cagrieve@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "c6cef20927e7c3d40c71644eb51a92b82a9d6add",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/gn/target.cc",
      "new_id": "a11a01433c67a029e48639da7d6e253fc602e33e",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/gn/target.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "81c93efa531bdf174c25500c34a98ad20ab13f31",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/gn/target_unittest.cc",
      "new_id": "7ed40558b6a3a0c137121e9446b9b677c50ce43e",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/gn/target_unittest.cc"
    }
  ]
}