GN comment spelling fix.

This addresses a review comment from https://codereview.chromium.org/1373903002/ that I forgot to fix there.

TBR=andybons@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1370293002

Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#351145}
Cr-Mirrored-From: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src
Cr-Mirrored-Commit: 70e884bceb30768f4161aa65275c5d82f0e62e77

tools/gn/builder.cc

diff --git a/tools/gn/builder.cc b/tools/gn/builder.cc
index 3a0c1f5..ca11e88 100644
--- a/tools/gn/builder.cc
+++ b/tools/gn/builder.cc
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
     return false;
 
   // Make sure all deps of this config are scheduled to be loaded. For other
-  // item types like targets, the "should generate" flag is propogated around
+  // item types like targets, the "should generate" flag is propagated around
   // to mark whether this should happen. We could call
   // RecursiveSetShouldGenerate to do this step here, but since configs nor
   // anything they depend on is actually written, the "generate" flag isn't